🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, nations are investing enormous sums into what's termed “sovereign AI” – developing domestic machine learning systems. From the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are competing to build AI that grasps local languages and cultural specifics.

The Worldwide AI Competition

This initiative is a component of a broader worldwide race spearheaded by tech giants from the US and China. While companies like a leading AI firm and a social media giant allocate massive capital, middle powers are additionally taking independent investments in the artificial intelligence domain.

Yet with such huge amounts at stake, can less wealthy states attain notable advantages? As noted by a analyst from an influential policy organization, Except if you’re a affluent government or a large company, it’s a significant hardship to create an LLM from the ground up.”

National Security Considerations

Many nations are hesitant to rely on overseas AI technologies. In India, for instance, American-made AI tools have occasionally proven inadequate. One instance saw an AI assistant deployed to teach learners in a distant area – it interacted in the English language with a pronounced American accent that was hard to understand for local users.

Furthermore there’s the defence factor. For the Indian security agencies, relying on particular foreign models is viewed unacceptable. As one entrepreneur commented, “It could have some random learning material that may state that, oh, Ladakh is not part of India … Employing that certain model in a defence setup is a serious concern.”

He continued, “I have spoken to individuals who are in the military. They aim to use AI, but, setting aside certain models, they don’t even want to rely on Western platforms because details may be transferred abroad, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

Domestic Initiatives

Consequently, some nations are supporting domestic initiatives. An example such project is in progress in India, wherein a firm is working to develop a sovereign LLM with state support. This project has dedicated about a substantial sum to AI development.

The founder foresees a system that is significantly smaller than leading tools from Western and Eastern firms. He states that the country will have to make up for the financial disparity with expertise. Located in India, we do not possess the advantage of investing huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we vie with say the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the America is investing? I think that is where the key skills and the strategic thinking plays a role.”

Native Emphasis

Throughout the city-state, a state-backed program is backing language models developed in the region's native tongues. Such dialects – including Malay, the Thai language, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and more – are often underrepresented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I hope the individuals who are building these independent AI tools were conscious of just how far and the speed at which the cutting edge is progressing.

A senior director engaged in the initiative notes that these systems are intended to complement bigger systems, rather than substituting them. Systems such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he says, often struggle with local dialects and culture – interacting in unnatural Khmer, for example, or suggesting pork-based recipes to Malaysian consumers.

Developing regional-language LLMs allows local governments to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a sophisticated technology built in other countries.

He continues, I am prudent with the word national. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we want to be better represented and we wish to comprehend the features” of AI platforms.

Multinational Partnership

For states trying to find their place in an intensifying global market, there’s a different approach: join forces. Analysts affiliated with a prominent policy school recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative shared among a consortium of emerging nations.

They call the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, modeled after the European successful play to build a competitor to Boeing in the 1960s. The plan would entail the creation of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the assets of several states’ AI initiatives – including the United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to develop a strong competitor to the US and Chinese major players.

The main proponent of a paper outlining the proposal says that the proposal has gained the interest of AI leaders of at least several countries to date, in addition to several sovereign AI organizations. Although it is currently focused on “middle powers”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have likewise indicated willingness.

He elaborates, In today’s climate, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s reduced confidence in the commitments of the existing White House. Experts are questioning for example, is it safe to rely on any of this tech? Suppose they decide to